| Pound-for-Pound: Blood In, Blood Out |
|
| Written by Dom Velando | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Monday, 21 January 2008 12:11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Whuttup, Wisconsin? It's been a long time, but I'm back with more of my asinine and unproductive opinions on the worldwide MMA scene. Read on!
{mosimage} Who can beat Penn? Sean Sherk. {mosimage} Meanwhile, subtract elbows, add knees, please. Years ago, the UFC needed some housecleaning in order to "legitimize" it and make it acceptable to the government (always the most impeccable judge of what's right for the people). So the UFC cooperated with state athletic commissions and put teh banthammer on kicks, stomps and knees to a downed opponent. I am alarmed. Yes, I understand that it's a very smart move on the UFC's part and that they're just trying to gain more fans, but isn't the UFC steeped in enough testosterone and laced with enough tribal tattooage (tattooery?)? I don't wanna listen to the guy next to me at the bar hollering about how "Sting would whip that Brazilian dude's ass". {mosimage} Until next time...
Set as favorite
Email This
Comments (14)
![]()
gswahhab
said:
|
|
... man i have to say that has me really worried that they are doing anything with pro wrestling |
|
luke
said:
|
... nice article! I would like to BJ/Sherk. NOt sure what the outcome would be in my opinion. |
|
Nate
said:
|
... When Sherk was at the GNC at Mayfair last year we asked him who his toughest opponent was. I believe he answered Nick Diaz, because he said Diaz did stuff he had never been exposed to. Could be a long night for Sherk because Diaz and Penn are similar in styles, only Penn is much better. Diaz vs. Sherk was a pretty boring fight. |
|
Bergeron
said:
|
... good article...i agree w/ MMA and wrestling should stay completey seperate, it'll only add to the "poser" fans... although for the sake of argument, i like elbows in the sport...it adds a whole new weapon for close range attacks from feet and ground. if a guy grabs ur wrist...u still have a weapon that the opponent must contend w/. |
|
Dom
said:
|
... don't get me wrong, i used to love ecw and wcw because those guys were real athletes. it's the wwe and the soap operas that i can't stand. |
|
Googan
said:
|
... IMO, elbows and knees are a huge part of MMA. UFC already does not allow stomps, knees and kicks to the head of downed opponents. If they take away elbows, MMA will be reduced to a combination of american kickboxing + wrestling + bjj. Don't call it MMA anymore if you want it like that. Call it kickboxing, wrestling and bjj = KWB lol. My solution to the cut problem is design an elbow pad specifically for MMA, just like the gloves were designed specifically for MMA. I'm sure there are a bunch of smart people that can design an elbow pad that will not detract from the fight and at the same time prevent cuts, just like a boxing glove does. |
|
Mark
said:
|
... Elbows need to stay. They are part of MMA. Getting cut is part of MMA. No need to change the rules. If it isn't broke, don't try to fix it. |
|
Kaz
said:
|
... I agree w/ Mark! Luke is that a fruedian slip in your comment above? You'd like to do what to Sherk???? |
|
dom
said:
|
... Yeah, and "Diaz did stuff he had never been exposed to"?? WTH are you freaks doing to my article? |
|
Rdub
said:
|
... I don't think the amount of stoppages warrant removing elbows. I can only remember a handful of fights that stoppage due to cuts occurred. The simple fact throwing elbows is skill set entrenched in martial arts and its able to end fights in knockout as well as terrificly gory blood baths. Learn them and learn to defend them. As far as knees on the ground I am not sure why cuts that are at most result in a realitively harmless amount of blood would be traded for a technique that can cause concussions and structural damage to the face. With that said I guess I am against them. |
|
Reedtard2
said:
|
... elbows stay they have 2 i agree having a fight stopped dew 2 a cut sucks but my answer to that problem is if your a fighter learn how 2 defend your self from them. if you can't adjust 2 them thats your problem. removing more things from mma like googan said changes the sport. its like the argument that when a ground specialist takes a striker down and lays on them they should stand back up; bullshit do something 2 stop it, just like elbows do something 2 stop them. mma is skill set vs skill set whoever has the best should win no matter how that win occurs ref. stoppage, doc. stoppage, tap out, or knock out |
|
Dom
said:
|
... 1) i don't think the argument "learn to defend against them" is legitimate. i could say that about any other technique. kicks to the balls? learn to defend against them. 2) if they called it kwb, would you still watch it? hell yeah, you would. if you've ever watched pride, then you've watched mma sans elbows and plus knees on the ground. and stomps and kicks but i never said add those. |
|
Reedtard2
said:
|
... kicking 2 the balls / bitting and those kinda things r not skill sets muyi thi is and elbow are very important 2 those fighters. as far as watching the "kwb" i would and i would still compete in it as well. however, i hope they stay,. |
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|



